
OpenFrame SIEM
Security Information and Event Mgmt. (SIEM)
Alternative Vendors
Commercial Alternatives

Key Features
Unified Event Store
Aggregates events from every integrated tool into one normalized, searchable database.
Normalized Log Aggregation
Events from RMM, endpoints, identity, and remote access share a common schema in the Logs screen.
Fleet and osquery Telemetry
High-fidelity endpoint data from Fleet and osquery queries feeds the event store.
Centralized Logs Screen
One place to search, filter, and investigate activity across the whole stack.
High-Volume Ingestion and Retention
Collects and retains large volumes of event data for investigation and compliance.
Multi-Tenant Monitoring
Client isolation so MSPs can monitor many tenants from a single deployment.
Pros and Cons
Pros
Single Normalized Event Store
Aggregates and normalizes data from all integrated tools, removing console-hopping.
Strong Endpoint Data Source
Fleet and osquery queries provide rich, structured endpoint telemetry.
Self-Hosted, No Per-Seat Fees
Runs in the OpenFrame core with full control over security data.
Unified With the Wider Platform
Shares a data fabric with RMM, PSA, and remote access instead of a siloed SIEM tool.
Multi-Tenant by Design
Manage many clients from one deployment.
Cons
Anomaly Detection Not Yet Available
AI-based detection is on the roadmap; today the focus is aggregation and search.
Fewer Built-In Detections
Lacks the large prebuilt rule and correlation libraries of mature SIEMs.
Newer Product
Less battle-tested than established SIEM platforms, with fewer references.
Requires the OpenFrame Platform
Most value comes when used inside the broader OpenFrame stack.
Self-Hosting Overhead
Self-hosted deployments need infrastructure and storage planning for event volume.
Feature Comparison
Comments
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience with OpenFrame SIEM.